9 Dec
2018
9 Dec
'18
9:30 p.m.
On 12/09/2018 12:07 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:54 PM zap calmstorm@posteo.de wrote:
Any plans to use rk3399 for a 2nd revision of the eoma68 standard? or any alternative arm processor? Since risc-v is maybe 3+ years out of the way?
yes. bear in mind it's around USD $5k-10k per design effort. i *may* be able to recover the RK3288 PCB i did. the RK3399 would be nicer.
My bad for responding to you directly and now too, but yeah, I think RK3399 would be better for meltdown spectre protection, etc...
Also, it is faster :)
l.
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk