--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Sam Pablo Kuper sampablokuper@posteo.net wrote:
I am still new to this community, and am more of a lurker than a contributor.
Many of the projects I am interested in have a code of conduct of some kind, typically based on the Contributor Covenant[0].
yes, they do. i've encountered several (and some Charters) including the ASF's Charter and others.
However, neither the arm-netbook mailing list nor the Rhombus Tech wiki has one, as far as I can see.
huh. never occurred to me before.
Does anyone else here think it would be, on balance, a good idea to adopt a Code of Conduct, perhaps based on the Contributor Covenant[0], for some combination of: this mailing list; the Rhombus Tech wiki?
ok. first thing that needs to be said: the wiki and the mailing list are there as resources (run by me) whose sole purpose is to support the goals of the EOMA initiative, for which (as the "Guardian of the EOMA Standards") i and i alone am currently directly responsible. "being nice" or "being inclusive" or "making people happy" is not a direct target, or a direct or indirect measure of success, in any way, as part of the responsibility of protecting the EOMA standards.
if there is to be any deployment of a Charter, it would be based around the goal of supporting and protecting the EOMA initiative; it would also be based on the Bill of Ethics https://www.titanians.org/the-bill-of-ethics/ with no other document being authoritative over or superceding it (ever).
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6918 and http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2122
i would be interested in an evaluation as to whether anyone feels that esr's comments are compatible with the Bill of Ethics. my feeling is that they are, and that the "Contributor Covenant" most certainly is not.
l.