And after having read some of the heat the project got on forums & mls we should be careful with the terms used to describe the "libreness" of it or it could degenerate quickly into an wikipedia editing war...
Just my 2cents
On 8/27/16, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl@lkcl.net wrote:
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Muhammed Adel Afzal adel@ncf.ca wrote:
Is "libre" better defined, and a better match, for EOMA-68? Better than "open" standard, I mean. Genuine question .. I have no idea.
Wiki says "open" right now.
i know... it doesn't say "open source" though :)
honestly, i don't know. "libre" has a specific connotation that requires that the "four freedoms" be applied to it. i honestly haven't evaluated that yet.
l.
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk