I'm not entirely sure why resolution should be relevant. Something without small defining characteristics that are unclear or illegible when the resolution is low might be desire-able, but I would assume so long as any is still atleast 10 pt font when shrunk to 3cm on its widest dimension, it should be sufficient.
On 3/18/17, Alain Williams addw@phcomp.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:14:11PM -0700, Mike Leimon wrote:
...
Oh and I have one more general comment about logo creation of this sort... I think that it is very important to make sure it will look good rendered in only black and white because, that is essentially what it is going to look like when the logo/certification mark gets silk-screened onto a product.
And also low resolution especially when scaled so that it is really small - eg the side of some box. This is my objection to the top of the two logos that you have.
-- Alain Williams Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer. +44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/ Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php #include <std_disclaimer.h>
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk