On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Jean Flamelle eaterjolly@gmail.com wrote:
That was weird, but anyways I updated the table by reorganizing it, cleaned the source a bit, added data for apertus and projects on the list.
*well-known* :) is urbit actually... well-known??
Let me know what you think of the formating changes.
liked some, didn't like others. "etiquette guidelines" doesn't have the same toxic punch as "code of conduct" is well-known for. liked the idea of including the VCS and if it's libre-hosted (likewise for bugtracker) but *not* the wording you chose ("self-hosted"). self-hosted could mean "proprietary and therefore unethical" and people would put "yeah it's GR8 maaan!" so i changed it back *specifically* to "is it libre hosted yes or no" because that's really important.
basically we're collating info - evidence - that ethical (or unethical) practices support a project's lifecycle... and other obseervations. what practices make a project both ethical *and* long-term successful.
also i turned the table round by 90 degrees as i could see it getting far too long, and then broke them down into related groups. still some TODO.
l.