On Saturday 2. May 2015 09.51.11 gacuest@gmail.com wrote:
I have seen that are developing several EOMA-68, but all have very little power or are old (like A20, JZ4775 or IC1T). This makes that many people that are looking for powerful hardware is left out of the EOMA-68 market.
I personally regard low power consumption as a good thing, and I guess the reason for focusing on that is the original intention to use EOMA-68 in, well, an "ARM netbook". ;-)
As for things being old, I suppose the A20 is "old" if you regard anything that isn't the manufacturer's current generation of products as old. Then again, maybe I don't care as much as you about this: my desktop computer is ten years old, and running GNU/Linux means that I've not been forced to upgrade to bail out various large corporations repeatedly over that period.
What is the future of EOMA-68? Any EOMA-68 with a powerful hardware (like Tegra X1 or Intel Bay-Trail)?
Another consideration is openness. Are either of these technologies sufficiently open? Nvidia have traditionally had a bad reputation for this, perhaps only courting openness when they've struggled to attract customers, as I remember being the case with their SoCs: I think the summary was that they promised a lot and delivered comparatively little, and the customers all switched their future designs to other SoCs in disgust.
Paul