--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Wolfram Kahl kahl@cas.mcmaster.ca wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:14:07PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
what *really* needs to be done with as many eyes on it as possible is to just go over both schematics and play "spot the difference".
- Page 1 of the CT schematics needs to be compared to Page 5 of the
EOMA68-A20 ones
- Page 4 likewise needs to be compared to Page 10.
http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/allwinner/a20/A20_Cubietruck_HW_V10_130606.pdf http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/allwinner/a20/DS113-V2.2-2014-07-24.pdf
In what formats and where are the sources for these available?
PDFs... and no. the cubietruck's board layout is proprietary.
(This question arises as secondary from the more primary question: ``are automated eyes for this purpose feasible'', for which I might be tempted to attempt to force a ``Yes'' answer if I find sources in appropriate formats.)
nehhhh good question but you'd be looking at installing windows 7, then installing ORCAD 16.3 and Mentor PADS 9.5... i mean i _have_ actually managed to get ORCAD running under Wine but due to a severe limitation of wine that the developers have failed to comprehend for over 10 years now the thing utterly sucks and blows at the same time gaaaaaad it's slow :)
by the time you've gone through all that hassle a simple visual scan (i did one just now... 5 minutes... i'll do another one later, and again next week) is far far quicker.
l.