ok so it would seem that the huge amount of work going into RISC-V means that it's on track to becoming a steamroller that will squash proprietary SoCs, so i'm quite happy to make sure that it's not-so-subtly nudged in the right direction.
i've started a page where i am keeping notes: http://rhombus-tech.net/riscv/libre_riscv/ and the general goal is to create a desirable mass-volume low-cost SoC, meaning that it will need to at least do 1080p60 video decode and have 3D graphics capability. oh... and be entirely libre.
the plan is:
* to create an absolute basic SoC, starting from lowRISC (64-bit), ORGFX (3D graphics) and MIAOW (OpenCL engine), in at least 90nm as a low-cost proof-of-concept where mistakes can be iterated through * provide the end-result to software developers so that they can have actual real silicon to work with * begin a first crowd-funding phase to create a 28nm (or better) multi-core SMP SoC
for this first phase the interfaces that i've tracked down so far are almost entirely from opencores.org, meaning that there really should be absolutely no need to license any costly hard macros. that *includes* a DDR3 controller (but does not include a DDR3 PHY, which will need to be designed):
* DDR3 controller (not including PHY) * lowRISC contains "minion cores" so can be soft-programmed to do any GPIO * boot and debug through ZipCPU's UART (use an existing EC's on-board FLASH) * OpenCores VGA controller (actually it's an LCD RGB/TTL controller) * OpenCores ULPI USB 2.0 controller * OpenCores USB-OTG 1.1 PHY
note that there are NO ANALOG INTERFACES in that. this is *really* important to avoid, because mixed analog and digital is incredibly hard to get right. also note that things like HDMI, SATA, and even ethernet are quite deliberately NOT on the list. Ethernet RMII (which is digital) could be implemented in software using a minion core. the advantage of using the opencores VGA (actually LCD) controller is: i already have the full source for a *complete* linux driver.
I2C, SPI, SD/MMC, UART, EINT and GPIO - all of these can be software-programmed as bit-banging in the minion cores.
these interfaces, amazingly, are enough to do an SoC that, if put into 40nm, would easily compete with some of TI's offerings, as well as the Allwinner R8 (aka A13).
i've also managed to get alliance and coriolis2 compiled on debian/testing (took a while) so it *might* not be necessary even to pay for the ASIC design tooling (the cost of which is insane). coriolis2 includes a reasonable auto-router. i still have yet to go through the tutorials to see how it works. for design rules: 90nm design rules (stacks etc.) are actually publicly available, which would potentially mean that a clock rate of at least 300mhz would be achievable: interestingly 800mhz DDR3 RAM from 2012 used 90nm geometry. 65 down to 40nm would be much more preferable but may be hard to get.
graphics: i'm going through the list of people who have done GPUs (or parts of one). MIAOW, Nyuzi, ORGFX. the gplgpu isn't gpl. it's been modified to "the text of the GPL license plus an additional clause which is that if you want to use this for commercial purposes then... you can't". which is *NOT* a GPL license, it's a proprietary commercial license!
MIAOW is just an OpenCL engine but a stonking good one that's compatible with AMD's software. nyuzi is an experimental GPU where i hope its developer believes in its potential. ORGFX i am currently evaluating but it looks pretty damn good, and i think it is slightly underestimated. i could really use some help evaluating it properly. my feeling is that a combination of MIAOW to handle shading and ORGFX for the rendering would be a really powerful combination.
so.
it's basically doable. comments and ideas welcome, please do edit the page to keep track of notes http://rhombus-tech.net/riscv/libre_riscv/
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68